Monthly Archives: September 2011

Hungry For Minimum Wage Jobs

Here’s a good one from the Perry camp:

Rick Perry’s wife, Anita, hit the road to stump for her husband. She reiterated her husband’s mantra about Texas being the nation’s job creation machine. This time, though, the Perry camp conceded that the jobs created in Texas might not be the best jobs around. In fact, a lot of them are minimum wage jobs.

But that’s o.k. Mrs. Perry says that Texans and the hundreds of people entering the state daily are “hungry” for these minimum wage jobs:

There you have it. From the source. Texans are clamoring to fry potatoes at fast food restaurants. They just can’t wait to clean bathrooms. They’re rushing to Texas to work at gas stations and at car washes. They couldn’t care less about working conditions, and they have absolutely no need for employer-paid health insurance.

Mrs. Perry is, of course, just telling the truth. These facts don’t lie:

Texas has the fourth highest rate of poverty in the country.

Texas is tied with Mississippi for the highest percentage of workers holding those wonderful minimum wage jobs that Mrs. Perry says they so dearly desire.

26% percent of Texans have no health insurance.

Texas leads the nation in uninsured children, and is Number 4 in the number of children living in poverty.

Hey, but on the other side, Texas is Number 1 in executions and Number 9 in the rate of incarceration. They’re obviously excelling at some things.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lies, Big Lies And “Total Crap”

The “Big Lie” theory is a well-known propaganda technique.  Its basic operating assumption is simple: the bigger and more preposterous a lie, and the more often it is told, the more likely it will be believed.  Or, Richard Belzer much less delicately defined the principle:

“If you tell a lie that’s big enough, and you tell it often enough, people will believe you are telling the truth, even when what you are saying is total crap.”

Bob Cesca posted a great piece last night in the Huffington Post attributing Rick Perry’s success in the polls to his uncanny ability to spew “total crap” with “thunderous gusto.”  Cesca notes that Perry’s biggest lie of all is that President Obama’s stimulus package has created “zero” jobs.  This is “total crap” because it is a total lie:

“The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA, also known as ‘the stimulus’) saved or created 1.3 million to 3.6 million jobs. IHS/Global Insight reported 2.45 million jobs were saved or created. The Macroeconomic Advisers reported 2.3 million jobs were saved or created. And Moody’s Economy reported 2.5 million jobs were saved or created.”

These inconvenient facts are, however, completely irrelevant to Perry. 1 million, 2 million, 3.6 million jobs? So what? Perry will repeat with gusto his “total crap” that “zero” jobs have been created under the Obama Administration because it is a perfect “big lie” that many voters will believe.

And, they will believe it precisely because it is “total crap.”  They have been told repeatedly that the Obama Administration is a total economic failure, and that job creation has been non-existent. So, when Perry says over-and-over again that the Administration has created “zero” jobs, they will take it to be true. “It must be true. I have heard it so many times.”

This fits nicely with other “total crap” that defines the debate in the GOP.  Even Olympia Snowe (R-Me), often considered a reasonable GOP senator, responded to President Obama’s deficit reduction plan by blaming the national debt solely on supposedly out-0f-control spending:

“we have witnessed not only a large growth in debt over the past decade but a massive acceleration of debt most recently, with $2 trillion in new debt added just in the last two years. Clearly, spending is the problem, so why would more taxes be the solution?”

Political Correction countered Snowe’s assertion by publishing this simple, elegant chart that it called “reality”:

Although “reality” shows that the “massive acceleration” of debt us due substantially to decreased government collections — particularly during the recession of 2008 and 2009 — the GOP’s mantra will be the “total crap” that “out-of-control” spending is the cause of spiraling debt. The basic point being, of course, that increasing “collections” — “more taxes — must be avoided. Large swaths of voters will believe it because they have heard it so many times. The Big Lie becomes the Big Truth.

More than 80 years ago, Edward Bernays, the “father” of public relations, wrote a book called Propaganda, whose main thesis is that:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.”

Bernays believed that this “manipulation . . . of the masses” was a good thing because it was the only way to organize “vast numbers of human beings” and ensure the smooth operation of society.  He later wrote that “[t]he engineering of consent is the very essence of the democratic process.”

The GOP seeks to engineer consent by repeating “total crap” about the economy over-and-over again until enough voters believe it to be “total truth.” They wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t true. They wouldn’t say it over-and-over again it wasn’t totally true.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Paul Ryan, Class Warrior

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis) took to the streets yesterday — the “streets” for the GOP being Fox News — to slam the Obama Administration’s plan to impose a minimum tax on incomes over $1 million as “class warfare“:

“Class warfare . . . may make for really good politics but it makes for rotten economics.”

 

 

 

On the same program, Ryan said that he is opposed to extending a cut in the payroll tax on incomes up to $106,000, which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year:

“this particular idea was tried in the Bush administration, earlier in the Obama administration. It hasn’t worked, and especially when you’re taking these temporary tax rebates and paying for them with permanent tax increases, that is actually self-defeating.”

The “permanent” tax increases to which Ryan is referring are the proposed minimum tax on incomes over $1 million, and the scheduled expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013.  The Bush tax cuts disproportionately benefit higher income earners.  Let’s put Ryanomics into perspective:
  • Raising taxes on incomes over $1 million is class warfare
  • Permitting temporary tax cuts to expire is a tax increase
  • Permitting a tax cut benefiting workers earning up to $106,000 is not class warfare

Ryan has positioned himself as the “heart and soul” of today’s GOP.  Earlier this year, he authored a long-term plan that radically alters Medicare by making it essentially a voucher system that would increase healthcare costs for seniors.  His “Path To Prosperity” seeks to cut social spending and reduce the top tax rate on individuals and corporations to 25%.

The undercurrent of Ryan’s path to prosperity is that the people he calls “job creators” are already taxed too much:

“Look, if you tax something more . . . you get less. If you tax job creators more, you get less job creation. If you tax investment more, you get less investment.”
Taxes, however, are already at their historic post-World War II low, as Robert Reich put into sharp focus yesterday:

“Officially, income over $379,150 is supposed to be taxed at 35%.  And even 35 percent is a pittance compared to the first three decades after World War II. Before Ronald Reagan slashed taxes on the rich in 1981, the highest marginal tax rate was over 70 percent. Under Dwight Eisenhower it was 91 percent. Even if you include deductions and credits, the rich are now paying a far lower share of their incomes in taxes than at any time since World War II.”

Yet, for Paul Ryan, any hint of increasing taxes on people earning more than $1 million annually smacks of “class warfare.” Ryan said yesterday, though, that he supports increasing taxes on incomes up to $106,000 a year. I don’t know about you, but that sounds like “class warfare” to me.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rep. Steve King: No Work, No Eat

Here’s a really good one.

Rep. Steve King of Iowa, a leading Tea Partier in Congress, says that unemployment benefits have created a nation of slackers:

“We can’t have a nation of slackers . . .We’ve gotta get this country back to work and get those people out of the slacker rolls and onto the employed rolls.”

Rep. Steve King

Unemployment benefits are, of course, princely throughout the United States. The maximum weekly benefit in Florida? $275. Alabama? $255. New York? $405. California? $450. Its obvious why people would want to slack off in places like Florida. $275 a week buys a lot of Dollar Value Meals at McDonalds.

Unemployment benefits do not go down the rat hole. Political Correction notes that the Congressional Budget Office and “scads of economists” say that unemployment benefits “are an immensely efficient way for the government to spur economic activity.”  You see, unemployed people still need to eat, they need to buy clothing, they need to put gas in their cars, and they need pay their water and electricity bills. All of this stimulates the economy.

King, though, has a position on this, too:

“I mean, John Smith said clear back then in the 1600s, No work, no eat. That also’s part of the New Testament, where he lifted that from I believe is Galatians, He who would not work would also not eat.”

King doesn’t even want to let ‘em eat cake. That’s too generous. He’s got a new Tea Party Manifesto: No work, no eat.

Via Political Correction

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Michele Bachmann Knows Healthcare Privacy Whe She Sees It

Well I’ll be darned.

Stung by the continuing criticism of her claim that vaccinations against HPV could lead to “mental retardation,” Michele Bachmann today issued a strong endorsement in favor of healthcare privacy:

“I oppose any governor or president who mandates a family’s healthcare choices and violates the rights of parents on these issues.”

Healthcare decisions, Bachmann said, “are best left to parents, the children and their doctors and should take into consideration the child’s health and the family’s values”:

Bachmann, of course, touts herself as being “100% pro-life” and thinks abortion should be illegal in all circumstances.  She even said recently that as President she would “most assuredly” confront the Supreme Court over Roe v. Wade.

Call me old-fashioned, but I thought the decision whether to terminate a pregnancy was one of those “healthcare choices” “best left” to the pregnant woman, her family and her doctor, taking “into consideration” the woman’s health and, of course, “the family’s values.”

I guess for Michele Bachmann, a “family’s values” should only sometimes be taken into consideration when in the making of healthcare decisions.  Sometimes the government can make a healthcare decision for a family, sometimes it can’t.

Healthcare privacy thus is just one more thing Bachmann knows when she sees it.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Bachmann Can Earn Money For Charity By Proving She Is Not Making Things Up

Michele Bachmann finally gets a chance to prove the naysayers wrong. And she can earn money for charity, to boot!

It seems that a bioethicist named Art Caplan is challenging the perpetually fact-challenged representative from Minnesota to prove her televised claim about a woman who told her after Tuesday’s Tea Party debate that her daughter became mentally retarded after receiving an injection of Gardisil. Never mind, of course, that the injection against HPV is usually given at age 11 or 12, which is hardly the time of onset of mental retardation. But I digress. As we know with Bachmann, facts can be such pesky things.

Nevertheless, Caplan says he will donate $10,000 to Bachmann’s charity of choice if she can find the elusive tween or teenager who became mentally damaged after being injected with Gardisil.  “It’s ethically obscene,” Caplan said. “The stakes are too high to try to get political advantage by putting young women’s lives at risk.”

Ok, Michele, the battle is now joined. You can sock it to the liberals in the media once and for all by proving that your assertions are not merely the wild and unsubstantiated ramblings of a nut case. And, you can do it with science, proving also that the GOP is not a coterie of anti-science zealots living in the 18th Century.

Go for it, Michele. You can kill two birds with one stone.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Rick Perry: I Got Bad College Grades Because I Was Tired

Today’s fresh Snake Meat comes from the estimable Rick Perry.

The Huffington Post recently obtained a copy of Perry’s transcript from Texas A&M. It is not a pretty sight:

A “D” and an “F” in organic chemistry.  A “D” in the principles of economics.  A “D” in Shakespeare.  A “D” in veterinary anatomy. Two “C’s” in the history of the United States.  A “C” in physics.  A “D” in trigonometry.

Perry managed to pull “B’s” in government, algebra and business law.  His only “A’s”:  Something called “Improv. of Learning” and something else called “World Military Systems.”

Today in a speech at Liberty University — founded by the late Jerry Falwell, and not exactly a citadel of academic excellence — Perry blamed his poor college marks on the rigorous military training during his freshman year at Texas A&M. “They wore us out so much that not a single member of my freshman class managed to stay awake in class for the first few weeks.” That, claimed Perry, was “kind of the start of why my grades were what they were.”

I guess then that Rick Perry is not as dumb as everyone thinks. Although he couldn’t make sense of the “principles of economics,” and he barely understood the history of the country he wants to lead, he was just tired. He was very, very tired. For four entire years.

Rick, get some sleep. We wouldn’t want anyone to think you truly are dumb.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Let ‘Em Die

Just prior to last night’s Republican Tea Party Debate, comedian Andy Borowitz tweated a “hypothetical” debate question to the eight participants:

“How does your plan for dismantling the US government differ from al-Qaeda’s?”

It was clear from the reaction of the Tea Party audience in attendance that many in the GOP want nothing less than the dismantling of government.

Take their reaction to Rick Perry.

They applauded loudly when he repeated his attacks on Social Security. They booed him loudly for a Texas law permitting high school graduates to pay in-state college tuition if they lived in the state for three years. They booed him even more loudly for his Executive Order mandating that every girl in Texas be vaccinated for HPV to avoid cervical cancer.

Md_horiz

Also consider the reaction to the Ron Paul’s screed on health care.

Paul was asked about a hypothetical healthy 30 year old who refuses to purchase health insurance, but is then hospitalized with a serious illness. Paul said the person was on his own. He made a choice in a “free” society. Paul was applauded loudly. He was then asked whether society should just “let him die.” A crowd reaction is at about 0.58 in the following clip:

The takeaway from the Tea Party Debate is pretty clear. Social security, health care, tuition assistance, vaccinations are simply not the business of government for a large segment of the GOP’s primary voters. You will be booed and heckled if you say anything good about government. You will be applauded for trashing government.

Hey, its a free society. If you can’t make it on your own, well then maybe you just can’t make it all.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Rick Perry, 17th Century Man

I never knew that the 17th Century controversy over acceptance of the Copernican theory that the Earth revolved around the sun was ignited, at least in part, by concern that it might lead to job losses.

But, a spokesman for the Perry campaign said today that the Governor’s invocation of Galileo at last week’s Republican Candidates Debate in support of his position on climate change referred to “vetting policies before implementing ideas that will result in job losses.

Numerous internet searches have yet to turn up commentary by Galileo or his opponents as to whether acceptance of the Copernican would, or would not, lead to job losses. Transcripts of Galileo’s trial in 1633 are not readily available. It thus is not known, for example, whether economists testified that acceptance of the theory would have had a stimulative impact on the Roman economy of the day.

But, with Rick Perry around, I guess you learn something new every day. He wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t true.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: